Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Red Riots


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. – ABCDe ✉ 00:15, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

The Red Riots
''Administrators: AfD page being heavily vandalised and re-edited. Faster the delete of obvious band-vanity page happens, the better. &mdash; Gaff ταλκ 06:18, 28 October 2005 (UTC)''

Looks like a fun group of kids having a good time, but unsigned band = band vanity = delete. &mdash; Gaff ταλκ 00:41, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: was this just vandalized? Devotchka 01:23, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per original nom, and watch out for 24.34.171.59 editing votes. - Squibix 01:24, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, by the way. Devotchka 01:29, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, and someone keeps vandalizing this AfD vote. Andrew Levine 01:45, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:music. A Google search indicates that they are an unsigned band from Boston see with no indication of a national tour. Capitalistroadster 03:48, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. NN band vanity. Cnwb 06:15, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete NN band vanity. --Clay Collier 06:59, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per everyone. - Just zis Guy, you know? 08:49, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment article is an orphan.Geni 15:45, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

Strong Delete I HATE BAND VANITY! It's not notable and a waste of space. Newyorktimescrossword 19:19, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing on Allmusic, unimpressive googles, and no sourcable claim of notability in the article.  Also, vandalizing an AFD instead of presenting arguments is a pretty good negative indicator.  -Colin Kimbrell 03:28, 30 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.