Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Red Tyger Church


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ultimately uncontested.  Sandstein  05:57, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

The Red Tyger Church

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet any of the criteria under WP:BAND. Rogermx (talk) 19:21, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 21:58, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 21:58, 21 January 2017 (UTC)


 * They did get a little attention: New Times Broward-Palm Beach: "Red Tyger Church is the latest band from the (San Francisco Bay) region and possibly the most dynamic example yet of how the Berkeley scene is exploding with some of the most creative ideas in the name of rock since the original San Fran (or London) heyday of the 1960s. Yet another collective that functions as much as an idea as a band, the group seems to be floating down the same tributary as recent Jonestown. "Welcome," the grand finale, is a saintly send-up of awesome proportions that rivals the best of euphoric late-'60s bliss with its male/female vocals and up-against-the-wall vitality. Like the Jonestown and Warlocks before them, Red Tyger Church seems to have absorbed the dense grandeur of the Stones circa Beggar's Banquet through Exile on Main Street -- maracas abound, and tracks build to explosive crescendos." From a review of 2 touring bands; "The Red Tyger Church; Free Energy," (Harrington, Joe S. Broward - Palm Beach New Times; Fort Lauderdale, Fla. [Fort Lauderdale, Fla] 12 Feb 2004) .E.M.Gregory (talk) 10:52, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:50, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * That is one legitimate source- thank you for researching it. Do you think is sufficient for them?  Rogermx (talk) 22:18, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:11, 25 January 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * delete All I know I learned here or in a search of Proquest news archive; the sole article that came up is certainly insufficient to support an article.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:06, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   20:14, 2 February 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   22:32, 9 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.