Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Resident


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:35, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

The Resident

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lacks notability. All the external links listed lead to primary/secondary sources. The channel also lacks a significant number of subscribers compared to other channels, such as darkmatter2525 and ICEnJAM, which do not have their own respective articles. GuyHimGuy (talk) 23:18, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Other than a few trivial mentions like this PR reprint and reposts of her work, I can't find any actual coverage of this channel or of Harfenist herself. It seems to be known, but never actually covered in reliable sources. Being one of the first YT partners is enough that it'd squeak by speedy standards but it isn't of itself a reason to keep an article. Being a YT partner really boils down to the popularity of a channel more than anything else and popularity does not equal out to notability. It just makes it more likely that someone will have received coverage and/or awards, but it's not a guarantee, as there are quite a few popular channels that have received little to no coverage but have ten times the subscriber base that this channel has. If anyone can find this coverage then I'm open to persuasion, but I can't find where there is any. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:48, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * On a side note, if this is deleted then we should move The Resident (film) to this article space. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:50, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.