Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Restoring Music Foundation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Mooted - Article was deleted for Copyright violations. The article's content is exclusively based on an incompatibly licensed source (BY-NC-ND) and cannot be kept in any case. The article has now been deleted after staying listed at WP:CP for 7 days without any attempts at rewriting or otherwise addressing the copyvio issues. Note that since the AfD hasn't run its full course, this does not preclude the re-creation of a non-infringing article, but by doing so, editors willing to re-create are advised to mind the comments of the strongly developing consensus to delete expressed in this present AfD. MLauba (talk) 14:13, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

The Restoring Music Foundation

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

A non-notable foundation which is dedicated to "the restoration of the music industry", whatever that is supposed to mean. It appears to quite non-notable, and strongly fails WP:ORG. Google searches that exclude wikipedia and the website of the organization fail to turn up any helpful references. B figura (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 20:47, 13 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete since there is no evidence of this being a notable organisation. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:51, 13 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this organization. Joe Chill (talk) 22:14, 13 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete I agree with the previous two opinions. My search did not produce anything significant. --Stormbay (talk) 00:05, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, and and other !voters. As a sidenote, the same editor appears to have created another related article, Philip E. Daniels, to link in to this one; that article is now also at AfD. Wine Guy   Talk  00:35, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable organization. Creator appears to be making a walled garden.  ~DC  Talk To Me 01:57, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No significant coverage in reliable sources, and the article contains content released under the CC-By-NC license, which isn't allowed on Wikipedia.  The left orium  21:33, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I've blanked the article as it contains material that is not licensed appropriately for inclusion. The last revision is located here, for AfD review – Toon 14:27, 17 January 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.