Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Retrosexuals


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 06:29, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

The Retrosexuals

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No references at all, does not meet WP:MUS. The article was created in 2005 shortly after the band were formed therefore it looks like it was created as a means of promotion. After all there has been little activity on the article in 8 years. A Google news archive search reveals zilch. Therefore i propose deletion. Bluidsports (talk) 18:24, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 May 15.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  18:38, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Appears non-notable. --Pusillanimous (talk&bull;contribs) 18:51, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment amazing how this article survived eight years on Wikipedia without getting caught. But yeah, none of those sources are good enough.--TelevisionMan13 (talk) 22:52, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'm definitely in agreement. Not notable at all, no reliable sources - definitely not encyclopedic content.  --Jackson Peebles (talk) 01:42, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 16 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone  00:10, 23 May 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.