Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Revels Group (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 03:10, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

The Revels Group
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Soft-deleted a month ago per AFD1, the article was re-created today by what appears to be a sock of the original creator. Definite WP:COI editing (though that in itself is not a reason to AFD). No RS in the article that I recognize.  ArcAngel    (talk) 01:22, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2023 February 24.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 01:35, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Companies.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:10, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Absolutely not ready for mainspace. The creator of this article is actually the same person who created the one that was soft-deleted. Shirt58 of the previous AfD and based on the (page logs) it's the third time they've created it. They're an  they're trying to write about. Rosguill  of the obligation to disclose their COI and to go through the AfC process, which they have not. Not opposed to draftifying it but I do have competency concerns. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:57, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - COI editing, and as has been stated. Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. Onel 5969  TT me 14:19, 24 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete. Billboard is an interview with the pair, Forbes is what appears to be the landing page for an author. Rest of the sources are about as trivial or non-useful. Oaktree b (talk) 14:41, 24 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete. It's just cheap spam. MarioGom (talk) 20:37, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Maybe they'll try to read the basic rules then. Suitskvarts (talk) 22:11, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete None of the sources meet NCORP/GNG criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing++ 15:58, 28 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.