Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Rezponder


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:46, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

The Rezponder

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:SIGCOV as nothing significant could be found from secondary sources about the subject —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 15:00, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 15:01, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 15:01, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:00, 13 September 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:45, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete That is a very small newspage. Actual posting of news started this year in June. They have a twitter account with 33 followers. Comment section is empty. There is no indication that this is a notable newspaper in Nigeria. It is not possible to find any information about editorial staff or anything company related, could even be a sophisticated blog by a single person. There is no 3rd party source covering or even mentioning this newspage, it has 0 reception in the world wide web. Google gives 18 (without duplicates) results, most of them wiki-copies. This newspage therefore fails WP:GNG abd specifically WP:NWEB, WP:NPERIODICAL and WP:NMEDIA. Dead Mary (talk) 12:43, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:PROMO; no indications of notabillity or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:56, 21 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.