Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Richlands


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Agnes Sligh Turnbull.  MBisanz  talk 02:24, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

The Richlands

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don't know if the Kirkus entry actually counts as a review, and even if it does, that's all I could find, and that's not enough to satisfy WP:NBOOK. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:18, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete (copyvio - not quite G12) and Redirect to Agnes Sligh Turnbull as  : Wouldn't count the Kirkus capsule review, or a handful of capsule reviews (, etc) which lean heavily on the Publisher's Weekly blurb, however PW has a longer review. There's also an unverified Pittsburgh Press review, and worldcat shows 8 editions (plus there's an audio version) and 515 library holdings. With what's indicated, I don't think it's reached a weak keep. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 11:30, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:34, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:34, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:46, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Delete and redirect I concur with my fellow editors above. MartinJones (talk) 18:34, 19 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.