Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Right Stuff (blog)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Triple parentheses. J04n(talk page) 13:21, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

The Right Stuff (blog)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (websites) requirement. Sources cited at best mention it in one sentence or so, so it lacks in-depth coverage. For anyone that cares to dispute that, please look at the policies cited above and explain why this website is notable. Few mentions in passing do not justify a stand-alone article - at best, they can be used to justify mentioning it in related articles like alt-right. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:45, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 05:11, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Rhododendrites  talk  \\ 15:13, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete/Redirect - Fails WP:GNG. Nearly all of what coverage it does have is connected to Triple parentheses, for which we already have an article. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 15:14, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:59, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:21, 1 July 2016 (UTC)


 * As the article's creator, I'm willing to support a redirect or merge; I initially created this article without being aware that Triple parentheses already existed. I do think "With Open Gates" needs to be covered somewhere on WP, though. I think the 8chan article is the best place because the video originated there. So, my vote is merge into Triple parentheses and 8chan where applicable, and redirect to Triple parentheses or alt-right. FiredanceThroughTheNight (talk) 02:54, 2 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - this blog has produced some notable stuff, but doesn't yet seem to be notable in its own right. It could be merged into Triple parentheses, except that basically all the relevant information is in that article already. Robofish (talk) 23:32, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment. I find merge idea totally fine. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 11:22, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge There is sufficient reference, content, and consensus to support a merge into a more relevant page space. Nikto   wha?  16:37, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and Redirect as there's still nothing actually convincing for its own independent notability as an article. SwisterTwister   talk  07:43, 9 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Selective Merge to Triple parentheses, which I feel is the most accurate merge target for this content. North America1000 13:07, 9 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.