Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ritz-Carlton Millenia Singapore


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 10:13, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

The Ritz-Carlton Millenia Singapore

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Procedural nom to list separately the various hotels bundled together in an earlier nomination. Rationale for deletion remains insufficient notability and of no encyclopedic value (see WP:NOT). Pascal.Tesson 20:00, 29 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep - Major luxury hotel in center of very internationally important city. Designed by notable architect Kevin Roche. --Oakshade 20:14, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup (despite being nominator!) I think this one clearly has above average notability but the focus of the article should be the hotel's history, architecture, place in city's history. Not on its flat-screen TVs. Pascal.Tesson 20:44, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Tall enough to be an automatic keep. Golfcam 21:17, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - per awards (that need references). Luke! 00:33, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - let's not go down that road. Do we know if any of these awards have any sort of significance? Are we going to create an article for a model of toaster every time a consumer's guide proclaims it is the best new toaster of 2007? As I said earlier, hotel articles are worthless if they are centered around the quality of the hotel's services. Pascal.Tesson 03:20, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Context and point of view are required. Granted in the real world we all specialize in specific occupations/industries, we are not all aware of other industry distinctions and awards. These awards clearly demonstrate the notability of this hotel property in the hospitality/tourism industry. Luke! 02:03, 31 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep per above. Chensiyuan 13:41, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, enough said. &mdash;Sengkang 15:29, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep It may look like a mere slab block, but it was featured in a publication and exhibition by the Urban Redevelopment Authority of Singapore, for instance. Is its architectural merit disputed? Non-notable and unencyclopedic?--Huaiwei 16:00, 30 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.