Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Roadents


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep.  Syn  ergy 00:14, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

The Roadents

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete Article/Stub reads like an advertisment. As do most of this users Articles... Imnotacoolguy (talk) 22:58, 23 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment: None of my articles are advertisements and it doesn't matter if it's a stub! Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 23:51, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Why do you think my articles are advertisements? Most of my articles are about films and books that I haven't seen or read! Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 23:55, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Non-trivial web presence indicates the show's got a following. The stub doesn't read like an advertisement to me, and mild irritation with a fellow editor's writing style - on a stub, no less! - is not a criterion for deletion. Let's not get itchy trigger fingers here. Fumoses (talk) 00:02, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Not at all an advert. Perfectly acceptable stub and externals show notability.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 00:34, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: I found another source. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 00:38, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I found another one. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 00:45, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * And another one. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 00:53, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * If you want to view the LA Times link, do a google search for it. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 01:21, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I added two comments from LA Times and Tilzy TV to the critical acclaim section. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 01:26, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The link to the LATimes article is broken. Could not find an LA Times article when searching with Google. Looks like this link was to a Blog anyway. What makes that a reliable source? Imnotacoolguy (talk) 05:54, 24 October 2008 (UTC)\
 * It is a reliable source because it is the LA Times blog. The link works because I viewed it today and added a quote to the article from it. You need to copy and paste the link into Google. It doesn't matter anyway, because that isn't the only link. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 12:39, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * copied and pasted link - 'Not Found The requested URL /webscout/2008/03/sony-debuts-six.html/ was not found on this server.' the other sources you list do not indicate notability.. How do they? Imnotacoolguy (talk) 22:03, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The LA Times link does work. Here is the link: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/webscout/2008/03/sony-debuts-six.html. I typed it in wrong. I bet that you think that it doesn't show notability also. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 01:27, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The comments for the show indicate notability. Please stop arguing with me about notability. You've already made your point. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 01:29, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - sourcing indicates notability. Phrasing is a little off, but requires a bit of a copyedit, not deletion. Wily D  10:31, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:32, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep; It needs a bit of cleanup and expansion, but otherwise notable. RockManQ  (talk) 00:30, 25 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.