Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Role Play Site


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Flowerparty ☀ 02:17, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

The Role Play Site
This is a forum that can't even afford its own hosting costs. It's nowhere near compliance with anything in WP:WEB so I am recommending delete. --Hetar 19:05, 20 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep - Just because we're using Proboards as a host does not mean we're not worth being on the internet altogether. When you flagged the page for deletion, we were still working on the page. It was nowhere near finished, and was to be a simple informational page on the forum - not an advertisement. You didn't give us any time to complete the article. Hetar is obviously biased just because we're using a free host for our forums. --Trps 19:11, 20 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete- This web forum doesn't have enough members and hasn't had enough influence to merit an encyclopedia article. Reyk  YO!  21:09, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, sorry, friend. I can't see how a self-admitted small forum (with 29 members) could be considered notable with any amount of article re-work.  Please read WP:WEB when you have an opportunity.  Kuru   talk  21:32, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails to meet any of the notability criteria under WP:WEB. --BillC 21:45, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable —Steven G. Johnson 22:03, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. DarthVad e r 23:40, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, and also userfy. -- Kicking222 23:48, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Userfy and delete from article space. No indication in the article that the site meets any WP:WEB criterion.  As of Sunday night, the article is mostly just an ad for something little more than WP:NFT material.  Unlikely to get enough coverage by reliable sources any time soon for inclusion in an encyclopedia.  Barno 01:47, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Only completed articles should be posted as articles. This should have been posted as a stub. Incomplete articles are deleted. The worthiness of bandwidth was never debated, the worthiness of a Wikipedia page was. It looks to me like it is a nice forum that doesn't deserve a Wikipedia page. --Cocopuffberman 03:46, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:WEB Percy Snoodle 11:31, 25 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.