Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Rome Review


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 17:13, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

The Rome Review

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unclear notability. No reliable sources in article and a Google search doesn't find any snigbrook (talk) 18:42, 23 June 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  KuyaBriBri Talk 20:27, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Too new. May achieve notability, but not yet. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:57, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. The author has worked hard on this, and this !vote hurts, but I feel the references are not good enough, being either blogs or not containing material about the subject.  The non-notability of the editors and publisher counts against it too.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 14:16, 30 June 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.