Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Roseview Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:49, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

The Roseview Group
Advertisement that makes no claim to notability. Delete. Note also the duplicate page The Roseview Group LLC. –Sommers (Talk) 22:15, 21 January 2006 (UTC) Please do not delete. The Roseview Group is a rising company that people will try to get information about. Please do not remove — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcostantini (talk • contribs)
 * Delete. It's an advertisement. Crunch 22:57, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Crunch. --NaconKantari (話)|(郵便) 23:02, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment, the author also created Roseview, Roseview Technologies LLC, Roseview Technologies, and Roseview Tech, which are the same article and should be considered for deletion also. --NaconKantari (話)|(郵便) 23:02, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Also Vince Costantini -- JLaTondre 23:08, 21 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. Doesn't meet WP:CORP. -- JLaTondre 23:08, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Please tell me how to make this not a advertisment. what to change to keep it up?
 * Comment. In order for your company to fit the criteria for inclusion, it should fit these Guidelines. Most companies do fit these guidelines and therefore most companies are not included in the Wikipedia encyclopedia. Crunch 00:59, 22 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete. This is speediable, as it's both an adevrtisemnent and a blatant copyvio (from the company's Web page. I've just deleted nearly over a dozen similar articles. --Mel Etitis  ( Μελ Ετητης ) 23:27, 21 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete ad, as per WP:CORP. --Terence Ong 03:41, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete; nn/advert. MCB 04:58, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as advert. I don't think it's a speedy. Stifle 01:03, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as spamvert. Ifnord 02:53, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per Mel Etitis Admrb♉ltz (T | C) 18:13, 26 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.