Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Royal Ballet School Diaries


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  15:57, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

The Royal Ballet School Diaries

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced article on a non-notable book. A Google search brings back little attention or reviews from major, independent and reliable reviewers and neither such a search nor the article show why this article meets the criteria for inclusion.  Dr Strauss   talk   15:24, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:05, 9 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor (talk) 08:07, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nom, this topic is so boring that no-one can be bothered to even comment for two weeks, after doing a search, I cannot find any evidence of notability either. It exists, has been published and is for sale, but has no independent reviews, media attention or any controversy. &Alpha; Guy into Books &trade;  &sect; ( Message ) -  11:34, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:54, 16 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment - I don't believe that being "boring" is an acceptable criteria for deletion. Beyond My Ken (talk) 08:02, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is a children's fiction series of the type popularized by the The Goddess Girls and Diary of a Wimpy Kid. Unlike those it does not seem to have any independent reviews., the stories are cute and the series is definitely not boring to the demographic to which it is aimed. Mothers who've bought it on Amazon report their girls love it. We'd like to feel that Wikipedia is welcoming to girls' and women's interests despite the fact there are so few female editors. StarryGrandma (talk) 01:00, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment this topic is so boring that no-one can be bothered to even comment for two weeks Thats pretty normal for AfDs. has over 40 pages in it currently.L3X1  (distænt write)  02:35, 24 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.