Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Royal Theatretime Briefs Company


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy deleted G4 by User:MONGO. --ais523 11:11, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

The Royal Theatretime Briefs Company
I doubt this is real, but then again, there are entities with 'Royal' in the name which are notable. Anyhow, this is nominated for deletion as a suspected hoax. --LiverpoolCommander 22:31, 18 September 2006 (UTC) — Possible single purpose account: Vaolza (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic. — Possible single purpose account: Annamoine (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic. — Possible single purpose account: Horsurfc (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic. — Possible single purpose account: Wolasa (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic. — Possible single purpose account: PLEEEASE (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.
 * Delete: this user has created a lot of strange articles about underwear and other vandalism. Most of it is speedy deletable, but see special:contributions/Polemyers and user talk:Polemyers. It only gets 8 unique google hits, and see this one, indicating it has been posted before. The associated image should also be deleted. Graham 87 10:06, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, very very very entertaining. And genuine as well.Ask "Mr.Pelican Shit" about this one.It's been posted on the simple wikipedia! --Balmayres 15:43, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 *  Keep. Excellent article. --Vaolza 15:46, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, without a doubt. --Annamoine 15:47, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, it's great fun! --Horsurfc 15:48, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, it's good.... don't deleeete it! --Wolasa 15:51, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets WP:CORP --PLEEEASE 15:52, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Hmmm, six keeps inside 9 mins, the last five editors having only a single edit each... I wonder.... Budgiekiller 16:36, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, Wonderful article. We need more underwear articles here. you can never have enough underwear articles. Andromeda466 10:25, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.