Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Royale Executive Club


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:16, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

The Royale Executive Club
35 members, ZERO ghits, unbelievable claims of power and influence, If its not an outright hoax (I think it is, but can't prove it), its a decidedly NN group. Delete Lurker  oi!  14:32, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as almost certainly hoax. No references, and "Royale Executive Club" gets zero Google hits.  Student clubs at a single school aren't generally notable anyway. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:53, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - awaiting references The author of the article enquired on the talk page about how to add references. Ergo, I have encouraged them to post the references there, and my vote will wait until I know how notable these are. I strongly suspect this is something made up at school. LinaMishima 15:57, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete sport coat mafia --Xrblsnggt 16:33, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Completely non-notable (and very small) college society. -- Necrothesp 23:01, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unless some reliable references turns up. -- zzuuzz (talk) 23:17, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Student organizations that exist at only a single school are generally non-notable. The article is written in the style of a vanity article yet states that the club has a racially discriminatory membership policy, which suggests that it may be a hoax anyway. --Metropolitan90 04:48, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep The puppet masters always are hidden backstage. In my time at the top I heard frequently of this group. I'm also suprised by the facts as I quickly learnt not to ask questions. However I know enough now to know that this is all true. -- Bpazolli 09:15, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete We must not let the existence of the puppetmasters be known. Doh! DJ Clayworth 17:47, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep I recently talked to the Chancellor of this group and he will be providing me with references over the next few days. I apologise for the delay in supplying these.

GOD SAVE THE QUEEN

Lord Protector 12:01, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Thanks for considerign addign references, but please note that proof of existence is not proof of notability Lurker  oi!  12:25, 16 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, unsourced schoolboy nonsense. Sandstein 20:10, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, absolutely fails WP:V, suspected WP:HOAX, WP:NFT, WP:VANITY. -- Kinu t /c  04:17, 17 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.