Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Saddest Landscape


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:59, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

The Saddest Landscape

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No clear notability established. smileguy91talk 03:21, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  05:10, 17 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment: So far I'm leaning towards a weak keep. There's just enough to assert some sort of notability here, although I'm going to try to dig a little deeper. The reviews aren't from exactly mainstream sources, but they are on sites that look to have a good editorial staff to where they'd probably be the rare exceptions to blog sourcing. But like I said, I'll dig a little harder. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   05:46, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. I couldn't find much beyond reproduced tour and release announcements. --Michig (talk) 08:09, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:53, 17 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Weak delete. I see that The Saddest Landscape gets some coverage from reliable sources like Rock Sound, Spin, Alternative Press, etc., however it all appears to either be a trivial mention or a press release statement about an upcoming tour or release of an album. The GNG also urges for sources to have a lot of detail so one can write a reasonably detailed Wikipedia article on the subject. I don't believe a reasonably detailed article could be written on The Saddest Landscape based on the sources I have seen. Fezmar9 (talk) 20:08, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 02:15, 24 November 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.