Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Safety of Eating Raw Cookie Dough


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Cookie dough. This should be a selective merge. The target article already has a section on this, and WP:UNDUE is a concern. Surprisingly, theres also a consensus to not leave a redirect behind. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:08, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

The Safety of Eating Raw Cookie Dough

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject is unencylopedic. Meatsgains (talk) 20:34, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge /Redirect  - To Cookie dough. I don't know that the subject is inherently unencyclopedic, but I also don't see a compelling reason that this should be a stand alone article when it could very well help fill out the main article which leaves much to be desired. No prejudice toward spinning off again if the main article eventually become too cumbersome.  G M G  talk   20:40, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Strike redirect per points raised by User:BD2412 that I should have but didn't consider.  G M G  talk   22:05, 8 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep: This article could be better obviously, but the topic itself seems completely fine if that's the issue. the topic is notable and in my opinion is different enough from 'Cookie dough' to constitute its own article. I just went to the Cookie dough article and added a see also section with a link to The Safety of Eating Raw Cookie Dough. That hopefully should be fine enough. And for anyone who without reading the article will come to this discussion and claim that the article is bias just because this topic could easily be made into a bias article, I can tell you from reading it that it's not. Grapefruit17 (talk) 21:08, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm not against the subject at all. My only concern is that it seems to be a definite subordinate topic to that of cookie dough, and it doesn't seem that the main article is developed enough to warrant a WP:SPINOFF.  G M G  talk   21:12, 8 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete- Doesn't deserve its own article, all can be stated in Cookie dough article. We don't have separate article for safety of eating raw eggs, chicken, beef, etc., nor should we.--Rusf10 (talk) 21:33, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete As per nom, this is not a reasonable topic (or title) for an article.  A selective merge would be OK if there is high-quality content to merge. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 21:37, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge - To Cookie dough. No redirect, as the capitalization of this title is unlikely as a search term, at least. bd2412  T 21:41, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge - No reason for this unnecessary content fork. Merging the content entirely would be WP:UNDUE so it is best for it to be selective. All we need is concise paragraph, maybe two if the sources permit.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 22:32, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete or, just possibly, Merge. This isn't a stand-alone subject, and is unlikely to ever become one.  Anmccaff (talk) 22:52, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 00:36, 9 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Merge with cookie dough. Vorbee (talk) 07:16, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge with Cookie dough. No redirect necessary (as per ). = paul2520 (talk) 17:10, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge with cookie dough. WP:SNOW TimTempleton (talk)  (cont)  22:58, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. The cookie dough article has a succinct section on health concerns.  There is not much that the content from this article can improve on in my opinion. As a standalone content fork, the The Safety of Eating Raw Cookie Dough article is not necessary to reduce the length of the cookie dough article. Finally, as BD2412 notes there is no need for a redirect.  Malinaccier  ( talk ) 00:12, 16 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.