Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sage School (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 06:14, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

The Sage School

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

While WP:SCHOOL was rejected, there are an extreme lack of ghits for the school, absolutely zero press coverage, and no hope of attribution to any reliable sources. As per our notability policy, "A topic is notable if it has received significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.", I have to argue that this article should be deleted. - Wo o  ty   Woot?   contribs  21:02, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 
 * Delete no indication of significance or notability, no outside or secondary sources, seesm like an ordinary undistinguished school. DES (talk) 23:04, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Ark yan  &#149; (talk) 17:19, 15 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete as per above. Lack of coverage or reliable sources makes it hard to keep something like this. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:29, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Source it or lose it. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  23:20, 15 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.