Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sandstone Intelligencer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete per SNOW and the PROD contestion that said, t would be hard to improve this article due to the fact that the subject matter is so new and referensing the actual articles would difficult due to the fact that there are very few in existence. Seems to say it all. NFT covers newspapers of questionable existence as well. TravellingCari 17:01, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

The Sandstone Intelligencer

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Patently non-notable. Proposed deletion contested on spurious grounds that notability cannot be established. Ningauble (talk) 04:17, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. An unofficial high school student newspaper, founded this year, with hardly any circulation, is unlikely to have garnered coverage in reliable independent sources. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:33, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. POV and verifiability issues aside, this is extremely non-notable per WP:N.  --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 04:35, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Metropolitan90 --  Darth Mike   ( Talk  • Contribs ) 04:46, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable at all. -Brougham96 (talk) 04:59, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable, largely trivial contribution to an encyclopedia. Johnrheavner (talk) 10:13, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Bathroom-distributed? So it's.... toilet paper? AlexTiefling (talk) 11:30, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. - McCart42 (talk) 16:59, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom; this could also be classified as patent nonsense.  The redirect page Sandstone Intelligencer should be deleted as well.Vulcan&#39;s Forge (talk) 01:47, 23 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.