Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sapper VCs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Royal Engineers. If the content has been merged, deletion is not suitable. I'll redirect it. Courcelles (talk) 04:26, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

The Sapper VCs

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Book does not appear to be notable. Unable to find any reviews/coverage in RS at all. Fyddlestix (talk) 04:13, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 04:14, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 04:14, 19 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Merge with Royal Engineers - Decorations section, where it is likely to be more informative.Pincrete (talk) 09:49, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Incidentally, the book defines 'sapper' more loosely than R. Eng, including 'commonwealth etc' sappers serving under British command and ex-sappers serving in other regiments Sappers VC ext link, this should be corrected. Does this affect my merge suggestion?Pincrete (talk) 10:07, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I took the liberty of merging the content with Royal Engineers.Pincrete (talk) 16:35, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:19, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. The content of the book is significant. The book itself is not. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:20, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:46, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: per Necrothesp. The book isn't notable enough for its own article, IMO. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 12:09, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - doesn't appear to be notable per WP:NBOOK. Anotherclown (talk) 12:36, 28 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.