Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Scene Aesthetic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, fails WP:BAND. Black Kite 09:16, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

The Scene Aesthetic

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Seemingly very non-notable band. Prod removed by another editor without comment or alteration.  tomasz.  10:13, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep The band has released an album on iTunes, which received good "air time" there. I believe that alone should contend for notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Red Deadeye (talk • contribs) 15:38, 1 April 2008
 * It doesn't; pretty much anyone can put out an album and get it on iTunes.  tomasz.  20:26, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete iTunes doesn't mean ANYTHING about the noteworthiness of a band. Plus the article has been nominated and/or deleted once before. Plus, the article is too short and poorly written.  Cra sh U  nderride  05:22, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 * It was nominated for deletion the first time by the same person who nominated it this time -- not two separate people. Moreover, being too short and poorly written isn't grounds for deletion.  It just needs some additions and cleaning up. --Crushti (talk) 04:40, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:42, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - No evidence of notability provided in the article, unable to find any. Fails WP:MUSIC. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 15:57, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep I'll concede that iTunes doesn't make a band notable. But it's not just a band that nobody except locals know.  Red Deadeye and I have never been within maybe a thousand miles of a performance, but we both know its music.  Furthermore, it's not just isolated recognition.  I know tons of people here who are fans of the band.  There are only two reasons why you might consider it non-notable: 1) their fan base and support stems from the internet and 2) their record producer isn't very well known.  Well, in the former case, viral internet fads find themselves noted all over Wikipedia, and I feel that, in the latter case, a producer's lack of notability does not warrant a lack of notability for something. --Crushti (talk) 04:37, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment You and others know them: WP:ILIKEIT. Viral internet fads are all over WP: WP:WAX. The producer's lack of notability is not a lack of notability for the band: We're looking for what is notable about the band, not what is not a lack of notability. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 14:41, 4 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:MUSIC. The article mentions a tour—depending on the size of the tour, if "non-trivial coverage in a reliable source" can be found, notability could be shown. — Hello, Control Hello, Tony  15:15, 4 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.