Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Scholar Athlete Academy by Ben Summers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 02:52, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

The Scholar Athlete Academy by Ben Summers

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article is about a sports training academy/company that has no significant coverage in reliable sources. The sole reference in the article is a press release, and there is no other coverage that I am able to find to establish notability. Note that there is a related AFD at Articles for deletion/Benjamin Daniel Summers. Whpq (talk) 15:35, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Article fails to meet primary criteria for notability of companies of significant coverage by independent sources (WP:COMPANY). Article's source consists only of company's own press release with an external link to company's website. Searching the web, I only find the same company press release. —Bagumba (talk) 18:30, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  —Bagumba (talk) 18:36, 28 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. My research reached the same conclusions as Whpq's and Bagumba's--no indicia of notability here.--Arxiloxos (talk) 01:55, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 29 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Wikipedia is not a free advertising site.--Paul McDonald (talk) 16:51, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. No independent verifiable sources to establish notability.  It's based on a press release issued by the subject.  Appears to be promotion of the subject. Cbl62 (talk) 19:45, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Per Paul McDonald and Cbl62, delete self-promotion. – Muboshgu (talk) 12:50, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.