Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Scowcroft Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Very clear consensus that notability is satisfied (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 18:10, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

The Scowcroft Group

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:NBUSINESSPEOPLE and WP:GNG, and mostly unsourced. Sheldybett (talk) 11:06, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:17, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:17, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 15:41, 10 November 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Seriously? NYTimes: ; WaPo: ; Foreign Affairs: . Isn't this what Wikipedia does?  I mean, have articles on widely cited, significant political consulting groups.  So that our users can see who and what they are?  See also closely related Articles for deletion/Franklin Miller.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:13, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
 * page improvement can begin with material in ''The Strategist: Brent Scowcroft and the Call of National Security, published by PublicAffairs, 2015 pp. p.500 visible on gBooks . some pages not visible, might require a walk to the library.   But, truly, WP:DELETIONISNOTCLEANUP.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:26, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep this notable organization per WP:GNG and WP:NEXIST. gidonb (talk) 03:26, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   13:29, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep, refs above are unarguable. Szzuk (talk) 18:26, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
 * WP:SNOW keep. seriously.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:01, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep This is silly. Atchom (talk) 05:48, 24 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.