Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Scrambler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Punkmorten 11:36, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

The Scrambler

 * — (View AfD)

Found while clearing out the CAT:CSD backlog. deletion reason was - Too short and unrefernced and not wikified, I think this could be a not notable article, and or an advertisement. Opinions? No Stance}} —— Eagle (ask me for help) 06:57, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Too short of an article. Need more info and editors. TheMaskedRider
 * delete - per nom. --61.114.193.19 14:29, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * KEEP I think it need more work - Overall I found it to be OKAY article, thank you for your time. Rcehoppe 08:15, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Agent 86 19:54, 11 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete due to lack of evidence indicating notability per WP:WEB. No Alexa rank, no indication that it's read beyond a small group of people, and possibly made up one day, based on the history. And it's on its fifth issue, so WP:CHILL likely applies as well. -- Kinu t /c  20:01, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't find any notability Bec-Thorn-Berry 21:05, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as insufficiently notable. No coverage by reliable, third-party sources. -- Satori Son 06:41, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non-noteable and poorly sourced. Davidpdx 11:03, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.