Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The SecDev Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  23:58, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

The SecDev Group

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The references don’t suggest notability, it fails WP:CORP most of the contributors have been WP:SPA. Devokewater (talk) 15:11, 20 December 2021 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   21:01, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Devokewater (talk)  15:11, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Devokewater (talk)  15:11, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Devokewater (talk)  15:11, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * <p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.