Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Secret History of Star Wars


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. PhilKnight (talk) 13:49, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

The Secret History of Star Wars

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:BK. A search on Google Books and the Google News archive yielded no positive result. The book itself may be a great source about Star Wars, but it doesn't merit an article about itself. user:Everyme 08:20, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:BK. LonelyBeacon (talk) 09:08, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - I don't really believe in the notability guidelines; I'm much more of an inclusivist. WP:IAR. I figured that the main Star Wars pages cites this book as a source, so it must have some importance. But of course, I understand that I'll probably be overruled, what with WP:BK being an established guideline and all. Sonicsuns (talk) 20:52, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete article consists of one sentence, no sources. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 04:54, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. A possible source, bu to indication of notability for the book itself.--Tikiwont (talk) 09:28, 23 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.