Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Seldon Plan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep, as improved.-- Kubigula (talk) 23:21, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

The Seldon Plan

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

non-notable band Mhking (talk) 17:12, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete vanispamcruftisement, and top ghits are all either selling something or blogs.  Thin boy  00  @778, i.e. 17:40, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

--Goferwiki (talk) 04:36, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep First, this is a stub. Second, the page was vandalized and I am not sure by who or why, but I am going to revert this to the original page. Third, going by criteria for notability, this band as far as I can tell has been in a couple films, was associated with the notable Lonley girl 15 series, has been in national press (I found a couple articles in The Baltimore Sun), and has been on tours with national acts. They were also featured on National Public Radio and I have found a whole bunch of NPR station interviews with them. I think all of this is pretty good evidence for notability. And again, it is stub. I can find no evidence of this online, but it mentions an appearance on Current TV. I think that this argues for some notability as well. Especially based on the fact that this is a stub, I think it should stay until more info can be fleshed out. AS far as links selling something, every band website (including huge bands) has records for sale...that should not be criteria for deletion. If that were the case all talk radio pages and music websites should be deleted.
 * That's a good assertion of notability, and it would really help if you could cite those specific Baltimore Sun articles etc. so others can verify that info. I've found a few sources that I'm adding. –Pomte 06:51, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rt . 16:23, 4 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:MUSIC#1; several non-trivial citations have been added, as well as details of the coverage Goferwiki discusses. Rigadoun (talk) 20:36, 4 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.