Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Semi-Royal Shakespeare Company


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. --Daniel Olsen 01:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

The Semi-Royal Shakespeare Company


The subject gets about 12 Google results and appears to be a high school troupe. Fails WP:ORG. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 00:20, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable school organisation.--Anthony.bradbury 00:24, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep This is notable. It is a fully functioning theater company (even if it is affiliated with a school), and should be kept in Wikipedia. It could use more sources though... Diez2 00:27, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete not substantially different than the drama clubs found in just about every school in the country and around the world. The article does make a claim of notability in being the longest-running Shakespeare troupe in the US--unfortunately that isn't true.  Montford Park Players are older, as are others, I'm sure. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  00:35, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - I'm not sure if it meets notablity, but I think it would better to delete... Spawn Man 00:42, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:ORG. --Swpb talk contribs 00:49, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Starblind. --Brad Beattie (talk) 02:06, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. Completely non-notable.UberCryxic 02:07, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. 2 plays a year? Atlantis Hawk  06:36, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. RFerreira 06:46, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per non, NN drama club & starblind's research.SkierRMH 08:21, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, lacks notability, per Andrew Lenahan
 * Delete per above. MER-C 10:25, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, no claim to notability (Starblind points out the untruth of the "oldest" claim, and as for the idea that setting Shakespeare in the modern era is somehow original or unusual, well...) &mdash; Haeleth Talk 13:34, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. Hmm, strangely appropriate. Though even as a performing act, it doesn't assert notability. James086Talk 15:27, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete- Consider the words of Andrew Lenahan since he is a native wikipedian.In addition to that he is a writer. He may be an expert in the concerned subject.So I'm backing his opinion. Nileena joseph (Talk 15:43, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Andrew Lenahan; however, I would hate to see the article deleted based on the draft WP:ORG guideline, which I believe to be quite deficient and ought not be relied upon in its current state. Agent 86 17:18, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per notability. ---J.S (t|c) 20:15, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete lacks notability -- Orange Mike 22:09, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Rever e ndG 05:35, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. TheRealFennShysa 20:07, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.