Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sentinel Tower Southbank Melbourne 3006


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Singu larity  06:30, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

The Sentinel Tower Southbank Melbourne 3006

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Declined G11 speedy deletion nominee, but still appears to fail WP:N. SchuminWeb (Talk) 11:02, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NOTE. Google doesn't show any reliable resources. -- RyRy5 ( talk ) 11:37, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: due to lack of significant coverage in reliable sources.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 12:03, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Question on nominator: why did you decline the speedy? Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 12:13, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment yes, why? Atyndall93  |  talk  12:19, 27 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete I'd speedy delete but its already declined so, it fails to assert its notability and performing a google news, archive, books and search turn up nothing to indicate notability. Fails notability guidelines Atyndall93  |  talk  12:19, 27 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  -- Canley (talk) 15:15, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. It is properly named The Sentinel (Melbourne), as redlinked in List of tallest buildings in Melbourne, but that tells us that this 34-stor[e]y apartment building is only the 45th tallest in that city. There is probably notability for either Central Equity, the owner/developer, or Southbank Central, the Central Equity complex in entire, but not for each individual building therein. --Dhartung | Talk 21:23, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Nominator is correct - Delete.-- VS talk 04:52, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - as Dhartung suggested Southbank Central, under whatever its correct corporate name is, is probably notable. Orderinchaos 08:59, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, as per above. Building itself is not notable, but the complex it is a part of may be.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 09:59, 30 May 2008 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.