Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Seventh Decade: The New Shape of Nuclear Danger


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep. Non-admin closure. D ARTH P ANDA duel 20:19, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

The Seventh Decade: The New Shape of Nuclear Danger

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable book. This book does not have the fame or notoriety needed to have a Wikipedia page devoted to it. ScienceApologist (talk) 10:42, 11 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. Clearly notable: non-trivial reviews here, here and here. Johnfos (talk) 19:52, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Books reviewed in The New York Times are notable. -- Eastmain (talk) 00:49, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep A well-reviewed book by a notable writer and a major publisher? I would recommend withdrawing this AfD and acknowledging it was offered as an error. Ecoleetage (talk) 01:57, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems notable to me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AndrewLeeson (talk • contribs) 14:27, 13 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 20:33, 15 November 2008 (UTC)