Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Several Journeys of Reemus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:54, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

The Several Journeys of Reemus

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )


 * All I can find on Google about this game are places online where you can play it (even the references in the article point to such sites). I can't really find any coverage about it. (The article also violates WP:NOTGAMEGUIDE.) Erpert (let's talk about it) 17:52, 22 April 2010 (UTC)


 * The game series has received several annual award nominations, from The Mochi Awards at the Flash Gaming Summit, jayisgames.com and newgrounds.com. I'll add these to the article.  I agree that each chapter's synopsis isn't necessary.  User talk:SteveCastro  —Preceding undated comment added 18:48, 22 April 2010 (UTC).
 * Unless I'm mistaken, the Mochi Awards appear to be an online-only award event that doesn't pass WP:WEB. Erpert (let's talk about it) 06:13, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Mochi Awards are physically presented at the Flash Gaming Summit, a live conference in San Francisco, CA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.118.136.124 (talk • contribs)
 * I stand corrected. However, the Flash Gaming Summit doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG. Erpert (let's talk about it) 17:31, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:54, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:14, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The game was discussed during a panel at Casual Connect Seattle, a conference for casual game developers. The mention was covered by Gamasutra.  This reference along with Channel4 and Joystiq reviews were added to the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SteveCastro (talk • contribs)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Black Kite (t) (c) 01:09, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep There are four articles on Jay is Games, a snippet on Joystiq as well as this on Gamezebo which has some use. Although I'm very happy about the Jay sources it's got to be a weak keep because there are no significant sources from anywhere else. Someoneanother 13:00, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.