Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sim Wrestling League


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was delete. Mailer Diablo 17:50, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

The Sim Wrestling League
This article neither asserts its notability, nor comes close to meeting WP:WEB Seidenstud 03:28, 8 July 2006 (UTC) style="color: rgb(255, 10, 0);"> Humphreys SPEAK TO MEABOUTTHE THINGS I MESSED UP 04:16, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - Also, I should point out that it was created by The SWL who presumably is the website's owner. -Seidenstud 03:31, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Totally NN website. So little context it's impossible to tell whether there's a physical activity involved or not. However, google speaks louder than words.--IslaySolomon 03:42, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Spam. ~Kylu ( u | t )  04:09, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:WEB David <span
 * Delete. Sim wrestling - the only wrestling more fake than wrestling itself. Vanity, fails WP:WEB. --Core des at talk. o.o;; 05:28, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. TJ Spyke 05:44, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Alias Flood 17:01, 8 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment Throne: Yes There is a physical activity behind this website. I'm part of the e-fed and we have a great comunity.
 * I think you shouldn't delete it as it the following days this page it's going to get more and more information.
 * Tommorow we have a one year anniversary and The Sim Wrestling League it's here to stay so why delete it?
 * The one who made this page it's Captain Random one of the GMs. And we also gained some new members by this Wikipedia page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 193.77.133.215 (talk • contribs).


 * Comment. While it's very nice that you got new members from the page, using that as part of the argument for keeping it here, effectively means that it is an effective adverstisement. Unfortunately, Wikipedia already has a policy against that.  See WP:ADS for more info.  -Seidenstud 20:12, 8 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as non-notable and a self-admitted advertisement . -- Northenglish (talk) -- 21:52, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete with fire WP:VSCA. Danny Lilithborne 23:29, 8 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment Throne: It's not an advertisment and I didn't say that! This is like a homepage for us! we keep all information here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.250.60.171 (talk • contribs)
 * Fine then, but Wikipedia is not a free webhost either. -- Northenglish (talk) -- 21:16, 9 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment Throne: What do we have to do to be acepted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.250.60.54 (talk • contribs)


 * Comment. It's not a question of being accepted or not, it's answering the honest question of: "Does your group really belong in an encyclopedia? The official policy from WP:NOT reads:

Does this help to clarify at all? -Seidenstud 12:15, 10 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment Throne: Oh Yes Thank You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.77.18.187 (talk • contribs)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.