Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Simpsons Trading Card Game (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to The Simpsons (franchise). Eddie891 Talk Work 21:17, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

The Simpsons Trading Card Game
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Couldn't find any web sources besides Simpsons or game fansites, couldn't find any books that had more than a mention. QuietCicada - Talk 20:21, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Games. QuietCicada - Talk 20:21, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  20:37, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per the same consensus reached when this last when to afd just over 10 years ago, as the same issues are prevalent and it is no more notable now than then. Would weakly support a redirect to The Simpsons if there is any interest in an WP:AFD. Bungle (talk • contribs) 20:48, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to The Simpsons (franchise): it is mentioned there, so this seems like a logical-enough alternative to deletion. The last AfD supposedly resulted in a redirect to The Simpsons (which, 11 years later, still mentions it as well), though (if I'm reading them correctly) the logs and page histories don't seem to bear that out; the franchise article seems more like a logical target to me, though. It would certainly appear that, from a notability standpoint, all that has changed here since 2012 is that our standards may be tighter, and considering consensus did not favor keeping an article on this card game then…  WC  Quidditch  ☎   ✎  20:53, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to The Simpsons (franchise). Non-notable and lacks any quality secondary sources. I think a brief mention is probably more appropriate on the page of the franchise rather than of the primary work, given it's scarcely mentioned anywhere. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 08:16, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Redirect  and salvage what you can. Leitmotiv (talk) 07:53, 20 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.