Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Singles 1999–2006


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator. This is a combined non-admin close by myself and the nominator, who missed a few steps. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 13:58, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

The Singles 1999–2006

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I would like to nominate this article for deletion because The Singles 1999–2006 is not a very notable release: It has not appeared on any country's national music chart, it has not been certified gold or higher in at least one country and it has not won or been nominated for a major music award. Additionally, if you look Coldplay discography, you will notice details about this boxset can already be found there. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 01:55, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 13:42, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment - Per WP:NALBUM, the album does not have to satisfy all the requirements such as charting and certifications. If it received reviews and other reliable media coverage, that can suffice. This album received a profile in NME (currently footnote #3). The article relies on a couple of old hard copy reviews that I cannot verify (and Q Magazine is out of business), but if anyone can verify those, then this article might be eligible for keeping. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 13:50, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The NME review is https://www.nme.com/reviews/reviews-coldplay-8352-333269; it looks like Q magazine didn't publish its reviews online but https://web.archive.org/web/20070429213329/http://www.q4music.com/nav?page=q4music.about.currentissue mentions that there was a review. Peter James (talk) 16:14, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - (I already commented above.) The nominator is working to clean up a lot of obscure quickie Coldplay items, and that is okay but this one was a legitimate wide-market release that attracted some pro reviews. Thanks to Peter James above for tracking down some evidence. I think this article needs to be cleaned up and expanded with prose from the pro reviewers, but it qualifies as a viable stub. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 13:49, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
 * If we keep this article (which I'm obviously not very keen on), I would like to remove it from the chronology or at least making a separate one for the studio albums, all of these side-relases, which as you noted, are "obscure quickie items" make the current chronology harder to navigate. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 16:56, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
 * That's valid, and cleaning up the chronology is something you could do as a general editing effort, regardless of whether any of the articles in question are kept or deleted. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 19:17, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Just cleaned up the chronology today. I would like to withdrawn my nomination, is it possible? GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 20:26, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Since you have announced that you're withdrawing the nomination, anybody could wrap this up with a non-admin close. I probably shouldn't because I'm an involved voter. If that doesn't happen or if anyone else wants to vote/comment, an Admin will make it official on around July 15 or so. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 14:49, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 19:29, 11 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.