Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Six Month Rule


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WP:SNOW delete as unverifiable hoax / something someone made up / nonsense. Fram (talk) 13:38, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

The Six Month Rule

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:MADEUP.

Resubmission of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Six Month Rule in main namespace. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 23:18, 22 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete This article is complete nonsense Staffwaterboy  Critique Me 23:46, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:05, 23 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete This is urban dictionary material. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregg1234 (talk • contribs) 02:47, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - made up in class one day - borderline speedy. The Whispering Wind (talk) 02:58, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. There is some mention of a film by this name, but not any actual dating "rule" by this name. There is a mention in an article about someone's own 6 month rule, but it has absolutely nothing to do with what is laid out on this page. Ultimately this is a complete and utter hoax that at best is something someone came up with one day. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   03:21, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - unverifiable. Wily D 09:05, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Gregg essentially.-- SKATER  Speak. 09:35, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.