Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Skewed View


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 10:45, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

The Skewed View

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Vanity, POV, unsourced, NN Computerjoe 's talk 20:03, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable blog, fails WP:WEB Croxley 01:25, 20 March 2007 (UTC)


 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 08:01, 25 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Thethinredline 14:38, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, because we have no third-party reliable sources. Ab e g92 contribs 15:03, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as this subject is entirely unsuitable for an encyclopedia until enough sources can be found to make an article that conforms with policy. Mr. Berry 16:18, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable, no reliable sources. --DorisHノート 19:21, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable, POV, almost certainly written by blog's owner or friend thereof (violating WP:COI), since the article is the work of a single-purpose acount (see Special:Contributions/Lake2500).  --Seattle Skier (talk) 21:10, 25 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.