Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Skorpion Show


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Ineligible, but no arguments against deleting in two weeks either. Oops, ineligible. Upgrade to regular Regular delete but still uncontested. Star  Mississippi  04:24, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

The Skorpion Show

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Yes this youtube channel is ongoing; To check for notability; I compared this channel to other entries in the category and I looked for additional sources (and quality sources). Some of the other entries in the category had a library of referential support, or were picked up and highlighted by quality sources. After a search I concur with the long standing 2012 notability tag; I see no way to improve the article. Flibbertigibbets (talk) 04:24, 11 November 2022 (UTC)


 * PS.. there are many youtube channels; some notable some not. Flibbertigibbets (talk) 04:33, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  05:09, 18 November 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Previously deleted via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  05:26, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment and Internet.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:39, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete This web show has no significant coverage in independent reliable sources, so it fails WP:GNG. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 06:00, 25 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.