Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Skunk (writer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy Delete (A7, no assertion of notability) by User:BanyanTree. ColourBurst 15:21, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

The Skunk (writer)
Original Research, not verifiable, not notable Feeeshboy 08:38, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete an anonymous poster-to-blogs is not even close to being notable! :) I suppose the article was intended as a well-intentioned warning of sorts, but it simply doesn't belong on Wikipedia. Xtifr tälk 11:56, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - Failed notability test. -- Szvest 12:09, 31 October 2006 (UTC) Wiki me up ®
 * Speedy delete per WP:CSD A7, beacuse no assertion of notatbility. Sadly, people who post offensive things on websites are not rare enough to be notable. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:18, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per above. BTLizard 12:55, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete obvious A7 case. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:13, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - No notability, Just trying to draw attention to some idiotic thing somebody does.  Needs to go away, and fast.  Chris Kreider 14:09, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - per the reasons above, and tagged as such. Note that an article will not be viewed as a speedy delete candidate until the article is tagged as such. Go here to find tags. - b o b b y  14:44, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.