Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Smart Manager


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. After sourcing and reformatting by all later participants in the discussion concur that the problems raised by the nominator have been rectified and notability sufficiently demonstrated. ~ mazca  talk 13:48, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

The Smart Manager

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Company doesn't meet notability requirements, unless it should not consider as verifiability. ApprenticeFan talk  contribs 23:00, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: All that I can find is trivial mentions. Fails WP:CORP. Joe Chill (talk) 23:46, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Periodicals are difficult to find substantial coverage of because publications dont' often write about one another. I think there are indications of notability and it's enough to warrant inclusion. ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:15, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete- reads more like an ad than anything else.keystoneridin! (talk) 00:35, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

I recomnend the article on wiki. Recommend not to be deleted.--Su_hit (talk) 04:21, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * It is periodical-cum-magazine, regularly published for last 7 years. It has its own repute. It had published series of articles on World's best 50 management guru. It also published articles on world's best management books and India's best managers . Who's who writes for the magazine. It carries signifance for business, management, indian industry, etc. Its design layout is very different and diligent. It is also sold out of India in various foreign currency denominations. The magazine regularly features in search results.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- - SpacemanSpiff Calvin&#8225;Hobbes 18:02, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Tie up with CNBC, Launch on Indian Express, Contest coverage on Hindu Business Line, quoted by Hindu Business Line as first in the country to write about the concept of 'Best practices for family businesses', article reprinted in Hindu Business Line, Times of India, profile of the founder, Guardian UK writes about the company, quoted in Financial Express etc. Given that other news outlets consider then reliable and notable enough to quote and republish, or notable enough to write about, it passes our notability criteria. - SpacemanSpiff Calvin&#8225;Hobbes 18:18, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I have edited, referenced and stubbed the article. It should pass our notability guideline. - SpacemanSpiff Calvin&#8225;Hobbes 20:15, 4 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep per the Spiffster. Priyanath talk 00:50, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep more than a few sources, as per SpacemanSpiff's post above.  JRA _ Westy Qld2  Talk 08:33, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.