Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The SmashUp


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 11:20, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

The SmashUp

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Deprodded for claims of notability, but I can't find any sources. The only source is one review in Allmusic, which doesn't have a bio. I can verify that they have a soundtrack cut in Saw, but I can't find any significant biographical info. Two of the labels they recorded for may be notable, but I'm on the fence since one of their releases was a UK-exclusive EP that does little in the way of notability. So the lack of sourcing supercedes any possibility of them meeting WP:BAND. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep The band has two releases on important labels (Warcon and Eulogy; note that notability of the labels is not the issue, but rather whether they are "one of the more important independent labels" under the WP:MUSIC guideline. Nevertheless, the labels do have articles, and they do meet the criterion of having been around for some time and having a roster of culturally significant acts.). I've added links to some album reviews. Chubbles (talk) 17:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:54, 27 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep per album reviews and WP:MUSIC#5. Cavarrone (talk) 19:44, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep I believe rule #5 of WP:BAND is met here. According to iTunes, their first album was released under Warcon Entertainment and their second album under Eulogy Recordings. Unfortunately, rule #5 is vague, requiring us to determine if these are "one of the more important indie labels". However, even in the face of a vague rule we still must do our best to reach a conclusion; it's a close call, but I believe these two labels meet the standard. Both labels appear to meet WP:N and other bands that meet WP:BAND have signed to these labels in the past (Dir En Grey and New Found Glory respectively). -- Sailing to Byzantium  ( msg ),  00:55, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.