Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Smiley Kylie Medley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Kevin (talk) 05:11, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

The Smiley Kylie Medley

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Microstub about a medley of songs performed by a singer: no references, no evidence of notability, and close to speedyable. PROD removed by creator. Nyttend (talk) 01:20, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 03:49, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can not find significant coverage for this song, which is necessary in order to pass WP:NSONGS. An article that amounts to "'The Smiley Kylie Medley' is a medley by Kylie" is not going to cut it.  Gongshow  Talk 21:44, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is not an article and the subject does not deserve an article. The medley could be mentioned (very) briefly in the Kylie Minogue biography. Doomsdayer520 (Talk|Contribs) 08:09, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment There's no criterion under which this could be speedied; the only criterion that really applies to songs is A9, and that's only for songs by nonnotable artists; I expect that a singer whose article is featured can be assumed to be notable :-) Believe me, I would have speedied this if I could have.  Nyttend (talk) 14:17, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - oops, a procedural error on my part. My vote above was formerly "Speedy Delete" but I have changed it to plain "Delete" per Nyttend's statement. Either way, the arguments still stand. Doomsdayer520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:28, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete in a speedy fashion the article doesn't even define what the medley consists of. Here is the google search; no WP:RS's. J04n(talk page) 02:59, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Now that's a request with which I'll agree speedily :-) Nyttend (talk) 03:25, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.