Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Smithers Divide


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 16:17, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

The Smithers Divide

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence that this phenomena has been accepted by any form of peer review and is any more that primary research. Appear to be self promotion of a rather eclectic piece of work by a student. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk 07:52, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete a WP:BEFORE search of my own makes me agree with nom. SportingFlyer  talk  07:56, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Can't fault the guy for swinging for the rafters in naming his discovery (if it is one), but the rest of the world does have to take some notice first before we can cover it... -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 10:18, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:35, 5 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete He's got gumption, but gumption without secondary sources won't go far in these parts. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 16:30, 6 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.