Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Socrates Project


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:43, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

The Socrates Project

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable - seems like a conspiracy theory or fringe belief, and is based on one website. In any case, the article presents the subject from only one side. 069952497aComments and complaintsStuff I've done 22:15, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 25 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep-Interesting article, to be completed but referenced.--Goldenaster (talk) 13:54, 25 February 2013 (UTC) — Goldenaster (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep -a young article to be completed (f.e. wlinks are not yet inserted). References are few but sufficient. The argument is notable.--Soroboro (talk) 01:37, 27 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - No coverage in reliable sources whatsoever. References aren't few.  They are non-existent. -- Whpq (talk) 14:28, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 02:04, 3 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete A conspiracy theory or work of fiction with a fancy website that has received no coverage in independent, reliable sources.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  16:55, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete (G3, G11) This isn't even a conspiracy theory or fringe. This article and the website are attempts at viral advertising for a non-notable novel .  The website was made by Nautilus Media, the publisher of the novel.  The article was written by the novel's author.  -- ShinmaWa(talk) 19:36, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete-after the intervention above I read again carefully the article. No sources have been added. No w-links. I change my keep vote.--Soroboro (talk) 22:21, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.