Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sonic Edge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 11:02, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

The Sonic Edge

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable music developer. Article is written by someone affiliated with the company, so conflict of interest is apparent. CyberGhostface (talk) 12:24, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Regardless of whether it is written by affiliation or not this is the wikipedia guidelines I read: A Wikipedia conflict of interest (COI) is an incompatibility between the aim of Wikipedia, which is to produce a neutral, reliably sourced encyclopedia, and the aims of an individual editor. '''The article has been edited down to a neutral standpoint. The article is reliably sourced.''' I do have an interest in the article though it is not to promote oneself. Just as before I am open to any suggestions on making this acceptable. I have written and edited the page no different from many other company articles I have read on wikipedia. suggestions? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thesonicedge (talk • contribs) 00:16, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete are you familiar with the Monty Python song, "Spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam". The article may have sources (all primary) and it may be verifiable but COI still remains as the primary editor is still the one with COI. You need significant third party sources. Notability is not met. Darrenhusted (talk) 15:46, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

The article has been edited to a neutral standpoint and meets the wikipedia guidelines. Were this spam, there would be text indicating a special sale or discount for example. This is no more spam than is the Lucas Arts or Danny Elfman page on wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thesonicedge (talk • contribs) 21:47, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  19:21, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * It is not for you to say it is neutral, it is for other editors (ones who have made edits other than to this page and who don't have the page name as their username) to say. Darrenhusted (talk) 08:51, 13 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   kur  ykh   05:37, 14 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete- all the sources are primary. Fails WP:N. Reyk  YO!  05:50, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete spam. No third party sources for verification of notability. Themfromspace (talk) 06:39, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete spam. I just did a google search and there are very few references to this "The Sonic Edge" and those that are there are first party. There appears to also be a Christian music group and a sound card from Philips with the same name. The sound card meets the notability requirements if anyone wants to write that article. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 07:00, 14 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.