Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Speech by Marvin Amparo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete all. Michig (talk) 06:34, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

The Speech by Marvin Amparo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Series of non-notable, self-published books by Marvin Amparo (author page deleted per Articles for deletion/Marvin Amparo) that do not meet WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG guidelines. The only source that comes close to a reliable source is Farmingdale State College Student Spotlight - whether a college paper or a PR bit, it is not very independent, as Amparo is a student there. Congrats for graduating, Amparo '15, but until there are multiple independent reliable sources, these articles appear no more than publicity raising. --Animalparty-- (talk) 01:46, 10 June 2015 (UTC) I am also nominating the following Amparo book articles for the same reason:


 * Delete - the only reference is to an Amazon page? Nothing indicates that WP:NBOOK criteria are met.--Rpclod (talk) 03:40, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. I couldn't find anything to show that the books are ultimately notable enough for an article. Neither the author nor his work seems to be notable enough for an article at this point in time. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  03:55, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, part of a pattern of self-promotion from this editor. Blackguard  05:01, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: Constellation of promotional articles. It's not as if it will really even work. Ok, page rank boosting, maybe, but.... Subjects fail notability, and articles violate the no-advertising mandate. Hithladaeus (talk) 14:09, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 12 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.