Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Staff Canteen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 23:22, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

The Staff Canteen

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:NOTE. Having a news page on your web site does not make you automatically of note. Trevor Marron (talk) 18:18, 1 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per A7, so tagged ukexpat (talk) 18:19, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I have no issue with that, the editor who added the article had attempted to circumvent A7 so I was giving the benefit of the doubt. It all looks like a big advert to me as well! Trevor Marron (talk) 18:24, 1 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete- I've removed the A7, since I think there is some claim to notability there, enough that it should be discussed here in AFD. I don't think it meets the notability standards, mind, but I don't think it qualifies for speedy. Umbralcorax (talk) 18:43, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:12, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep- I think this page has some merit while I do agree that is worded like an advertisement. It should be re written in the format of some more popular web sites like facebook. Write this article as if it were encyclopedic. Origin, history, contributors... that sort of thing. I could see there being a page for this site because it seems to be widely popular in the chef community and also seems to be a fairly original idea. The references should be to public information about the site not references directly to the site that provides this service.Msimpson607 (talk) 04:43, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Niteshift36 (talk) 07:38, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.