Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Star Inn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep Keith D (talk) 17:37, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

The Star Inn

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. See WP:NPLACE. Rob Sinden (talk) 11:46, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. --  1Wiki8 ........................... (talk) 16:40, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. --  1Wiki8 ........................... (talk) 16:40, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. --  1Wiki8 ........................... (talk) 16:40, 15 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep – Passes WP:CORPDEPTH. Source examples include, but are not limited to:, , , , , , . North America1000 23:23, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:38, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment. Note that this is a Grade II Listed Building. Grade II doesn't provide inherent notability, but it is a factor in notability. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:41, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is just one ref in the article and those listed above are merely irrelevant articles about The Michelin Star status of the pub, they are repetitive apart from the one noting they poisoned 80 of their patrons! There is no depth in those refs, this is just a promotional page. Szzuk (talk) 19:31, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
 * You mean, articles about it getting a Michelin Star, winning various other awards, losing its star, as well as general reviews (talking about, inter alia, its ownership and history)? That seems a reasonable survey to me. (I am also the article creator, but I only created it as a stub so I'm not particular attached to it.) - Jarry1250 [Vacation needed] 20:41, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 22:31, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep – It's one of six restaurants in Yorkshire to have a Michelin star and, from the category, we have articles on six restaurants in Yorkshire. That feels about right. --Cavrdg (talk) 06:40, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. samtar (msg) 08:04, 27 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - article needs improvement, but a Michelin star and listed building status just about shoves this sufficiently far up the notablility ladder to survive. Suggest that article is moved to a title that includes the locality, as there are other Star Inn's across the UK. Mjroots (talk) 18:54, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Michelin star and listed building. I agree this just about pushes it above the notability threshold. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:04, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per the above - Michelin star restaurant and listed building status. └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 07:50, 11 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.