Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Status of Medjugorje


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy deletion, copyvio of text released under non-commercial-use-only license. Gimmetrow 04:56, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

The Status of Medjugorje

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Reads like an essay. Formatted like its copy and pasted from elsewhere. Hammer1980 ·talk 19:15, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Definitely reads like someone put there essay on here. ≈  Alessandro  ♫T • C 19:20, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Copyvio -- however, with appropriate sourcing (& probably change of article title) this would be as valuable as the many other articles in Category:Marian apparitions. Brianhe (talk) 19:35, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Amended from keep after copyvio issue was uncovered. Brianhe (talk) 04:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, it's a copyvio from http://inside-medjugorje.com/ Corvus cornix  talk  00:53, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as copyvio per Corvus. Now I wish I hadn't spent 10 minutes wikiformatting the article. The subject is probably notable, however, and an article would not be inappropriate. ZZ Claims~ Evidence 00:59, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - The article at Medjugorje is also related to this debate, as it appears to be an article about the village that actually speaks mostly about the apparitions. Even lacking the copyvio, this article would seem to be redundant to Medjugorje. ZZ Claims~ Evidence 03:32, 26 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.